AI 2040
Plan A
Thomas Larsen, Romeo Dean, Brendan Halstead, Eli Lifland, Ryan Greenblatt, Daniel Kokotajlo
About Us
The AI 2040: Plan A scenario is the third major release from the AI Futures Project, alongside AI 2027 and the AI Futures Model. We’re a research nonprofit working to forecast the future of advanced AI and (now) offer recommendations for navigating it. We created this website in collaboration with Lightcone Infrastructure.
Contributions
Thomas Larsen started the project and had final say on its content. He helped shape many of the core ideas and did a large fraction of the writing, including many of the supplements.
Romeo Dean led the verification research and the compute and economics modeling, and wrote the corresponding supplements along with helping to shape many related ideas.
Daniel Kokotajlo came up with many of the core ideas and did a large fraction of the writing for the main scenario and perspectives.
Ryan Greenblatt came up with many of the core ideas behind Plan A and gave extensive feedback.
Eli Lifland did project management, helped edit the main scenario, and wrote several supplements.
Brendan Halstead led the covert project modeling and wrote the corresponding supplement, as well as the takeoff supplement.
Lauren Mangla helped with project management and a wide variety of aspects of the project, including the website, user interviews, and leading the comms.
Raymond Arnold, Oliver Habryka, and Joanna Bregan of Lightcone Infrastructure built and designed the website and provided thoughtful feedback on the content, helping make the text and the communication of ideas much better overall—the foreword, opening of the scenario and deal section especially benefited from Raymond’s improvements.
Scott Alexander rewrote various sections of the plan and provided extensive feedback.
Nicole Sanna helped with the comms, project management, and a range of operations tasks.
Miles Kodama rewrote the insider’s perspective, triaged feedback, and researched legal authorities and other near-term helpful actions.
Josh Clymer helped with some of the early work around verification and dark compute.
Tom Houlden helped draft an early version of our economics model, and Tom Cummingham also provided helpful high level input on the economics modelling early on.
Mia Taylor and Fin Moorhouse of Forethought wrote the space governance supplement.
Vy Tran and Dillon Nguyen reviewed various supplements and provided operational support.
Dave Kasten and Eli Tyre for helping with user interviews, comms and other supporting tasks.
Nick Marsh helped research about near-term domestic policy ideas. Jeffrey Wang, Craig Jolley, and Liam Patell helped research likely government responses.
We used AI to help with many parts of the creation of Plan A, including for: programming, brainstorming pieces of text, and giving and summarizing feedback. Human authors wrote nearly all text in the final publication, and reviewed/edited the small amount of AI-written text.
Finally, our warm thanks to everyone who gave helpful feedback in their personal capacity: Aalok Mehta, Aaron Scher, Ajeya Cotra, Alex Kastner, Alex Mallen, Alexandra Bates, Andrey Fradkin, Andy Masley, Aniket Chakravorty, Anjay Friedman, Anson Ho, Ben Chang, Ben Goldhaber, Ben Harack, Brendan Steinhauser, Daan Juijn, Damon Binder, Daniel Filan, Daniel Reuter, David Rein, David Udell, Douw Marx, Edouard Harris, Eric Gan, Finn Hambly, Fynn Heide, Grant Demaree, Halfdan Holm, Helen Toner, Holden Karnofsky, Ida Caspary, Jaime Sevilla, James Sanders, Jason Hausenloy, Jeremy Gillen, Joe O’Brien, Jonathan Erhardt, Jonathan Mann, Joshua Jacobs, Juan Felipe Ceron Uribe, Julie Lifland, Jun Shern Chan, Kristian Rönn, Leo Gao, Linch Zhang, Luke Dawes, Luke Marks, Malo Bourgon, Max Harms, Max Nadeau, Michael Trazzi, Nate Soares, Nick Gabrieli, Nicky Case, Nikola Jurkovic, Noah Ringler, Oscar Delaney, Owen Cotton-Barratt, Philip Trammell, Richard Ngo, Roy Rinberg, Saif Khan, Sasha Krecinic, Seth Lifland, Simon Steshin, Steven Adler, Steven Veld, Sydney Von Arx, Tao Lin, the team at UK AISI, Tim Hua, Timothy Kokotajlo, Tom Davidson, Tom Milton, Trevor Levin, Varun Gandhi, Will MacAskill, Yafah Edelman, and Yannick Mühlhäuser.
This project was a deeply collaborative effort, and we’re grateful to everyone who helped bring it to life.
Get in touch
You can reach us at info@aifutures.org. We look forward to hearing from you.
If you’re interested in more of our work, you can subscribe to our Substack here. You can also learn more about us and the team on our website.
If you’re interested in working with us, you can fill out an expression of interest here. If you’re interested in helping make AI go well for humanity more broadly, check out this post on how to get involved. And if you’re interested in the kind of technical verification work featured in this plan, including tools that could help enable a trustless deal with China, here are some resources on how to get involved in the AI verification field.
We accept donations online or through major DAF providers.
Changelog
Changes made to our scenarios and research since initial publication.
August 2026
August 17th
Content changes
Scaling strategy clarifies existing prefer-compute-over-software recommendation
The capability-scaling-strategy supplement now states more clearly an existing recommendation in its Stage 1 strategy: the Consortium should make capability progress via training compute scaling rather than software progress to the greatest extent possible, because software improvements can be used by covert projects while compute cannot.
AI for epistemics: new note on targeted vs. broad levers
An added paragraph after the four areas of impact suggests categorizing them by whether they concern an especially important group's decisions (like AGI project and government decision-making) or society more broadly (like public influence via voting), and classifying interventions accordingly as "targeted" or "broad".
"Interventions" renamed to "Example interventions"
AI for epistemics: added citation and typo fixes
August 10th
Content changes
Draft playbook essays removed in playbook rollback
All saved drafts of the experimental playbook essay were taken down along with the feature that displayed them, including the main draft's policy recommendations ("Track where all the compute is", "Invest in verification R&D", "AI Training Transparency") and an imported copy of the "Explaining Plan A" essay.
Design changes
Playbook editor, versions, and outline HUD rolled back
The work-in-progress interactive playbook was removed from the site while it's reworked: readers can no longer browse saved essay versions on their own pages, edit the essay in the browser, or use the floating outline of expandable choice boxes and section tables of contents that came with it. A few related pieces elsewhere went with it.
in-browser essay editor removed
version pages and switching removed
standalone METR graph page removed
August 8th
Content changes
New "Living with Expert-Dominating AI" plan section
Section IV previously held a placeholder expandable ("[TODO, includes citizens dividend]") sketching job loss as AI reaches human level. It now defines "Expert-Dominating AI" — AI whose advice even top experts would do better to follow — warns that we must prepare for mass unemployment, and adds an "AI Dividend" box whose preview proposes a small tax on datacenter computing paid out to all citizens, like Alaska's oil dividend.
New and expanded hover previews across the plan
The "pretty heavy political lift" preview previously gave one reason (superintelligence sounds like science fiction); it now lists two — the science-fiction problem plus the need for robust global coordination. Two boxes under "What would sharing a world with wildly superhuman AI be like?" also gained first-draft previews.
"pretty heavy political lift"
"Minimal Safety and Property Rights"
"Universal Basic Galaxies"
Small wording tweaks across the plan
The "Why should I expect superhuman AI?" expandable now opens "Because AI capabilities seem to be rising at an exponential rate" instead of "Broadly, because AI capabilities seem to be going up at an exponential rate", and the Wildly Superhuman AI section's "there will be AI not just smarter than any human" became "there'll be".
Design changes
Outline rows now open one section at a time
Before, hovering a box could stack its peeked section under an already-pinned one in the same row. Now a row shows exactly one section: the hovered box's peek temporarily displaces the pinned box's section and gives it back when the pointer leaves. Peeks also open after a short delay and wait a moment before closing, so crossing the gap between boxes doesn't snap them shut.
Plan editing now works online behind a password
Outline boxes: two per row by default, new row styles
Rows previously packed in as many boxes as would fit at a minimum width, with special rules forcing five boxes onto one line and splitting six into 3+3; now each box takes half the row and extras wrap, unless a row is explicitly set to fit on one line — a new style alongside "compact" and "multi-open". Sections also open with a quicker, subtler animation, and headings inside opened sections are sized down so they no longer match the essay's own section titles.
Plus marks turn to minus only when picked, add tooltips
August 5th
Content changes
New essay: Explaining Plan A (and S and...)
A new page presents a plain-language explainer of the plans: the four dangers of superhuman AI (loss of control, concentration of power, destabilization, mass job loss), Phase 0 incremental policies, Phase 1 where the US and China build a verifiable "break pedal" by declaring compute and pausing training, Phase 2's choice of a long-term plan, and Plan A's four principles. Two new flowcharts map the choices: a Phase 1 path diagram landing on Plan D (Race to ASI), Plan C (Burn the lead), Plan B (Uncoordinated Slowdown), and Coordinated Slowdown, and a Phase 2 choicepoint splitting "Shut it all down" into Plans S+/S and "Verified Slowdown" into Plans A/A*.
Phase 0 policy boxes gain hover descriptions
The six incremental-policy boxes in the essay's Phase 0 section — Transparency, Enforce (or repeal) export controls, Invest in verification R&D, AI Compute Tracking, Improve government AI capacity, and Limit R&D budgets — were bare labels with nothing behind them; each now reveals the full policy description on hover, taken verbatim from the scenario's Incremental AI Policy Wishlist.
Design changes
Plan boxes expand into sections below their row
The essay's rows of labelled boxes (Phase 0 policies, Phase 1 paths) got a new interaction: hovering previews a box's content in a card, and clicking now opens that content as an outlined section spanning the row below, with a disclosure chevron that points right while closed and turns down when open. Previously the content only floated over the page while the pointer hovered. Rows size themselves so every label fits in at most two lines, and long rows split into balanced rows (3+3 rather than 5+1).
New accent color across HUD, charts, and globe
The playbook interface on the main scenario page swaps its reddish "race" accent for the Plan S accent color throughout: HUD panels and hover swaps, policy appearance, the extrapolated graph, datacenter labels on the globe, and indicators like alignment-researcher count, employment rate, and median income.
Explaining Plan A header drops title and byline
August 4th
Design changes
Analytics: wide date ranges no longer fail to load
Selecting a large date range used to fire a burst of queries at once, and the resulting overload often replaced the whole dashboard with a "PostHog not queryable yet" error. Data now loads one panel group at a time — the active site first, then the other sites, then the history graph — and momentarily rejected requests are waited out and retried, so every panel eventually fills in.
Analytics: date range can span a site's full history
August 3rd
Design changes
Hovering a link's preview card is now counted as reading it
The site measures which link hover-previews (image previews, curated preview cards, and note tooltips) readers linger on, to guide which previews get improved. Previously nothing was counted; now a hover of half a second on either the link or its open preview card registers once, with repeat-visited variants of the same destination counted together. Nothing about how previews look or open has changed.
July 2026
July 23rd
Content changes
New Plan A company financials explorer (WIP)
A new interactive widget at /companies-widget lets readers explore Plan A company finances: a params card of adjustable assumptions beside the figures, with a strip of headline summary values above the charts. The model assumes compute permits are auctioned at 80% efficiency and applies Cournot competition margins from 2030 on; an earlier AI-industry cash-flow panel was dropped before publishing.
Design changes
Changelog: every change now its own expandable
The changelog on the About page previously listed each day as a short headline plus a single expandable of minor items; now each day is split under bold "Content changes" and "Design changes" headers, with every individual change as its own expandable whose body ends in a red swoopy-arrow link jumping to the exact spot on the site. Text sizes across the changelog also grew, and on narrow screens the date now sits above its entry instead of squeezing beside it.
bold Content/Design section headers
red arrow deep link on each change
bigger title and 19px entry text
Analytics: cmd-click tabs and sorts into new tabs
On the analytics dashboard, the site tabs and column sort headers previously only updated the view in place, so cmd/ctrl-clicking or middle-clicking them did nothing. They now open the resulting view in a new browser tab on modified or middle clicks, while a plain click still switches the view in place as before.
July 20th
Content changes
Footnote 186: probe-launch claim now about time and energy
Plan A's footnote on colonizing the reachable universe previously said it's physically possible to "send out colonizing probes to the entire reachable universe in a short amount of time (e.g., 6 hours)"; it now says this takes "a surprisingly small amount of time and energy (e.g., only ~6 hours of the sun's energy output)", matching the cited "Eternity in six hours" paper.
Plan B: stray ":::box" text now renders as a proper box
July 18th
Design changes
Smoother red danger shading on the extrapolated graph
On the extrapolated capabilities graph, the red loss-of-control region used to misbehave when a plan's danger boundary sat far above the visible chart: the red faded to almost nothing mid-chart, and where the boundary climbed steeply near the top it compressed into a sharp red sliver with a hard diagonal edge. The red now deepens to full intensity at the top of the chart and fades out smoothly as the danger band exits the frame, even along steep boundaries.
July 17th
Content changes
HUD risk key renamed: Delayed → Trailing Actor Risk
In the capability block's risk key, the entry formerly titled "Delayed Actor Risk" ("The black dots: how far a project racing outside the deal has likely gotten by then") is now "Trailing Actor Risk," described as how likely a non-deal actor has reached the frontier at this point, e.g. because the deal broke down.
July 16th
Content changes
Cyber supplement: new chart of CVE data
The "Are Mythos cyber capabilities overhyped?" hover preview now shows a chart built from Epoch data — replacing a static screenshot — illustrating the spike in reported software vulnerabilities (CVEs) its text discusses; that text now calls the spike "large" rather than "significant".
OpenAI email date: 2016 → 2017 in the 2027 chapter
Corrections to external-link hover previews
Several hover previews shown on external links were corrected: the OpenAI-emails preview now credits the email to both Ilya Sutskever and Greg Brockman rather than Sutskever alone, the DeepSeek synthetic-data example drops from 800,000 to 600,000 worked solutions, the intelligence-explosion preview now notes the explosion is "driven by AIs improving AIs", the dataset-growth claim now cites Epoch's dataset-size trend, and a few typos ("feedbackloop", "capabilities climbs") were fixed.
Email credited to Sutskever + Brockman
DeepSeek solutions: 800,000 → 600,000
"feedbackloop" → "feedback loop"
Design changes
'2029: Choose a Path' flowchart now loads instantly
Mobile HUD: plan letters and uniform dashed lines
In the phone HUD strip's plan fan, each unselected plan line used to carry its own dash pattern (long, medium, dotted, dash-dot); all unselected lines now share one even dash, and the plan you point at or pick is identified by its letter (S/A/B/C/D) floating just above its line, with the label sliding to keep a constant gap from the line and steer clear of the year pill. The fan also animates in faster.
July 15th
Content changes
Link hover previews rewritten across the scenario
Several hover previews of external links were rewritten with concrete figures instead of placeholders: the AI Futures Model preview now cites ~1% of US GDP going to AI datacenters and human text running out around 2028 (replacing "[GDP fraction]" and "[x?]" placeholders), the recursive-self-improvement preview drops its long task-length quote for a short two-line definition, and new previews were added for takeoff speeds, the Superintelligence FAQ, and several Epoch and Astral Codex Ten sources.
~1% of GDP now cited for datacenters
new smooth vs. lumpy takeoff preview
NSA breach preview adds summary line
Hover previews gain small explanatory charts
Deal Decline supplement: tables get titles
External links no longer route through Google
2028 timeline marker moved in AI on the Ballot
Design changes
Hovering the graph shows capability + risk panel
Hovering anywhere on the capabilities graph now swaps the HUD's lower half to a stacked two-section explainer: a capabilities block with a subtitle, live R&D speedup readout, and the agent-level ladder, above two key lines explaining the graph's shaded fields — Takeover Risk and Delayed Actor Risk. The red risk field keeps its full strength while hovered instead of dimming.
Mobile scenario HUD updated
July 14th
Content changes
Plan A text and footnotes refreshed from latest draft
The scenario and its supplements picked up the newest edits: footnote URLs were corrected across the Plan A footnotes and several supplements (covert AI projects, deal decline, Plan A assumptions, space governance), a citation to a Newsweek report on an AI breach of US classified systems was added, and the plan B/C/D/S branch openings regained the timeline date markers that pace their side panels.
new Newsweek AI-breach citation
corrected footnote URLs
branch timeline dates restored
Compute supplement: quadrant figure matches its table
The AI-vs-non-AI × cluster-vs-single-device figure previously carved 2% of the AI fleet off as single-device and 0.5% of non-AI compute as cluster, contradicting the cluster-split table and its own legend. It now uses the table's categories — the whole AI fleet as AI × cluster, the specialty-consumer forecast as AI × single-device, servers as non-AI × cluster, consumer devices as non-AI × single-device — with the legend relabeled to match. Stock bars are also relabeled 2025–2029, the Jan 1 snapshots they actually show, instead of reading one year early; flow bars keep calendar years 2024–2028.
HUD power and metric figures now come from model sheet
The distribution-of-power block's shares — world and region totals, the global top-20 actors, and each region's remaining tail — are now taken directly from the model spreadsheet's concentration model, and during Plan A's 2029–2030 deal window the displayed date sweeps in the same January/May/September steps as that data. The plan B/C/D metric series also shifted slightly after being re-read from the spreadsheet.
Takeoff Supplement renamed to Takeoff Forecast
New hover previews for externally linked articles
Typo fixed in AI for Epistemics supplement
Design changes
Plan graph: risk field now shifts per plan
The black trailing-actor risk field is now the same base shape for every plan, slid in time per plan: 1 year left for Plan A, 7 for B, 9 for C and D, and 2 years right for Plan S, where it fades in faintly instead of drawing solid. The field is also lighter overall, drawing only on higher-risk tiles and at roughly half its previous peak density.
Hovering a plan choice previews its trajectory
Smoother scrolling when picking or leaving a plan
Footnote numbers fixed inside expandable sections
Footnote markers inside expandables previously showed a sequential position rather than the footnote's real number, so numbers could repeat or skip once expandables were opened; each marker now displays its actual footnote number, and its margin note appears whenever the expandable is open.
Nested hover previews fixed; positioning improved
Tilde no longer strikes through approximate values
Passages using single tildes for "approximately" — e.g. "~$0.7–1.1M per wafer (~$25–40K…)" in the compute material — previously lost the tildes and rendered the span between them as struck-through text; single tildes now display literally everywhere on the site.
July 13th
Content changes
Plan A assumptions: new intro on optimism vs realism
The opening no longer just says the supplement lists all main recommendations — it now explains the scenario's stance: roughly the author's median view on timelines and takeoff, but "realistic about empirical facts and optimistic about US government actions." The appendix table rating how plausible and desirable each key policy is was also tweaked.
Radical Transparency → Total Research Transparency
New hover previews for two external links
Plan B chapter: Plan A recap box fixed
Plan A: MSS link and footnote 186 fixes
In "2029: Choose a Path," the MSS link led to a malformed Wikipedia URL; it now opens the Ministry of State Security article. Footnote 186 previously said colonizing probes could spread to the entire reachable universe "in a short amount of time (e.g., 6 hours)"; it now says this takes "a surprisingly small amount of time and energy (e.g., only ~6 hours of the sun's energy output)".
Design changes
Choice point now offers five plans
Plan B/C/D graphs: y-axis zoom-out retimed
Black "trailing actor" shading now visible on plan graphs
Economics supplement embeds show only their chart
Each chart embedded in the economics supplement had been loading the entire interactive explorer — controls and all charts — instead of the one chart it illustrates. Embeds now isolate to their single chart, and the simple-model embed shows just the calculator.
July 12th
Content changes
HUD forecast stats rounded to match their precision
The scenario HUD's forecast numbers were shown with spurious precision — a rough estimate displayed as "3,771" safety researchers or "×1,937" AI speed implied accuracy the model doesn't have. Safety-researcher counts now round to one significant figure, and median income, AI speed multipliers, and welfare-panel researcher counts round to two, while small values like "1.5K" keep their meaningful fractional digit.
3,771 researchers → "4K"
"$10.3M" income → "$10M"
"×1,937" AI speed → "×1,900"
Deal-race breakdown chart: fresh simulation run
The "DEAL-RACE BREAKDOWN" chart now shows a new Monte-Carlo snapshot with 14,466 draws instead of 5,767 (built 2026-07-11 rather than 2026-07-09). The percentages shift slightly throughout — e.g. in the 1–2y scaling band without detection, the covert→milestone share moves from 36.3% to 37.5%.
Curly quotes replace straight quotes sitewide
Design changes
HUD: new power panel, ladder meter, graph clipping
Three changes to the scenario HUD: the below-HUD power breakdown now splits the world into country columns by frontier-AI access, with icons and an underlined key; the capability ladder is marked by a gliding red level-meter segment alone, replacing the black rail line (the details-panel ladder matches); and the graph's capability line, point markers, and hover dot now cut off at the top of the red dither field instead of floating up over the page navigation.
Plan C/D capability graphs no longer flatten early
On desktop, the Plan C and D graphs jumped their y-axis maximum to 1000 at the start of 2030 while capability was only around 3, cramming the line into a flat sliver at the bottom of the frame. The axis now ramps gently (6 → 12 → 60 for Plan D, 6 → 12 → 80 for Plan C), so the line sits around 25–40% of the frame through 2029–2031 and only shoots off the top when the plan's intelligence explosion actually hits — 2031 for D, 2032 for C — matching how mobile already behaved.
Cmd-F expands all collapsed text for in-page search
Plan B/C/D date pill steps in 4-month jumps
While scrolling through Plans B, C, or D, the date pill on the graph used to glide through every intermediate month, even though the timeline itself snaps in thirds of a year. The pill's month now snaps to January, May, and September to match. Plans A and S, which show year-only pills, are unaffected.
July 11th
Content changes
Compute supplement: wafer cost and hardware-R&D wording
Power diagram: new frontier rules for Plans B, C, D
World-compute history: RTX 4060 TOPS corrected to 968
The world-compute history chart's dense-INT8 throughput figure for the RTX 4060 was wrong; it now reads 968 TOPS, with the 4060 Ti at 1,412.
Econ explorer: outdated writeup PDF links removed
The acknowledgments line and the Model Explanation call-out box both linked to an out-of-date writeup PDF; both links are now gone.
Slowdown comparison chart: Plan A ladder label removed
The italic "Plan A — capability-shaped uplifts" label that sat above the chart's left milestone ladder has been dropped; the milestone labels themselves are unchanged.
Cankaya 2026 citation added to verification reading list
The verification get-involved section now cites Cankaya 2026 on bit-exact inference.
Design changes
Dashboard hover details restyled: subtler, smaller
The dashboard's hover details got a quieter treatment: the separator above each detail is now a thin dotted black line hung in the gap (it was a thick solid red rule), details start where the content they cover starts, and the AI Policies definition was trimmed to one line ("…or have not begun") so the policy map sits higher.
Separator: 1px dotted black, was 2px red
Titles and descriptions 13px → 11px
"Click for details" hint removed
Plans B/C/D: dashboard date now sweeps in 4-month steps
As you scroll a branch plan's story, the dashboard date previously leapt from one dated event straight to the next; for Plans B, C, and D it now advances between them in four-month steps, and the year pill shows the month ("Nov 2030"). Plans A and S, which move on annual phases, keep year-only dates. Also fixes the date occasionally stalling below the story's real markers (Plan D could stick at late 2030).
Plan S: capability chart no longer collapses after 2041
Mobile: dashboard stats no longer overlap power diagram
Mobile: strip tap only ever opens the dashboard
Tapping the collapsed dashboard strip could misfire: depending on where the finger landed, the just-opened dashboard immediately showed the AI Capabilities details view on top, or the sheet opened and instantly closed. A tap now only opens the dashboard; tapping the graph inside the opened dashboard still works as before.
Econ explorer: mobile chart embeds show just their chart
On mobile, embedded economics-explorer charts could each render the full explorer chrome — title, Full/Simple tabs, controls, and Parameters tab — repeated down the page; embeds now show only the single chart they illustrate, even on slow devices.
July 10th
Content changes
Text edits across Plan A chapters and supplements
Several rounds of wording edits landed across the Plan A scenario — from the 2029 Choose a Path chapter through the epilogue and postscript — plus the footnotes, both perspective pages, and several supplements; the covert AI projects supplement was cut down substantially, losing long stretches of its earlier discussion. Representative examples:
covert AI projects heavily trimmed
footnotes revised throughout
edits in every 2030–2040 chapter
New edited narration recording, ~8 seconds shorter
Downloadable PDF rebuilt with the new print design
Get-involved board: RAND and Community Night links
Policy scatter chart axis labels reworded
The chart's horizontal axis previously read "less plausible" / "more plausible" at its two ends and the vertical axis "less desirable" / "more desirable"; each axis now carries a single centered label — "plausibility at time of adoption" and "desirability" — with the arrowheads still marking the "more" ends.
Design changes
HUD hover panels: reliability and polish
The dashboard's hover details gained a consistent click-for-more hint, now cap their rows on short screens so they fit the viewport, and the power treemap's hover no longer misses in the gaps between cells or fails to light a country group when hovering its "Rest of X" block. The agents hover shows its speed-split line as an equation that visibly sums to the displayed fleet total, and the audio bar now drops out cleanly when the datacenter list or capability ladder takes over, and hides with the rest of the HUD during the epilogue.
treemap hover works in cell gaps
"Rest of X" hover lights its region
agents line sums to fleet total
Print and PDF book edition overhaul
The print pages grew a full bound-book treatment: pages moved from A4 to US Letter, sidenotes alternate to the outer edge on left and right pages, and a new cover-wrap maker renders a back-cover/spine/front-cover sheet sized to the book's page count. Many smaller print fixes landed alongside.
redesigned part-divider pages
designed back cover added
covers print on white, new AIF logo
Phones: metric panels no longer show stale data
Tapping into a metric detail panel on mobile showed the current story year in its header but data frozen at the timeline start — the Distribution of Power panel could read "2029" while showing ~2026 compute numbers (America 15.8M instead of 819M). All panels now show the data for the year the dashboard was displaying.
iPhone: projected-future line now draws on chart strip
Power treemap: generic logo capped at 2 largest labs
Frontier labs without a brand mark (Meta AI, ByteDance, G42, the anonymous "US co. N" holders) all showed the same generic AI-company logo, which wallpapered the treemap at late scenario dates when a dozen-plus of them turn frontier; now only the two biggest brand-less labs by compute show it and the rest render plain.
Safari: choose-a-path labels positioned correctly
Audio player links to Spotify and Apple Podcasts
Policy scatter chart: bigger tap targets on phones
Points on the chart were hard to hit on small screens, where the chart scales down; a tap now selects the nearest point within a comfortable ~48px touch radius at every screen size, and tapping empty space clears the selection.
July 9th
Content changes
Plan A text refreshed from the latest draft
Two content imports updated the scenario throughout: every Plan A chapter from 2029 through the epilogue, the footnotes and postscript, the public and insider perspectives, and several supplements — the Plan A assumptions supplement gains a key-policies appendix.
all Plan A chapters + footnotes
public & insider perspectives
new key-policies appendix
Covert Sankey: China 2028 compute numbers updated
The "Where the covert project acquired compute" figure now shows China's 2028 inflow of new compute as 13M H100e (was 15M), of which 3M smuggled (was 5M), matching the compute supplement's §1.3.1. The smuggled tranche now resolves as 2M declared immediately, 500k to the covert project, 400k bought back, and 100k still missing (previously 3.5M declared and 900k buyback).
Covert supplement: chip figures redrawn in site style
The chip sales-tracing tree and chip-lifecycle diagrams, previously static image exports with their own typefaces, are now drawn in the site's standard figure style: ink for the traceable sales chain, dashed red for the shell-company diversion, amber for the traceable tree. Crossing arrows into the "Decommissioned" box were untangled, and the strategy-overview chart drops a handwriting font that rendered as an arbitrary serif on some systems.
ink/red/amber two-tone recoloring
"trail goes dark" label removed
overview chart: standard figure font
Econ supplement: explorer links now open on-site
AI Policies & AI Labor hover definitions reworded
Deal-decline supplement: dangling footnote removed
Design changes
Labor legend: top AI speed; hover shows fleet split
The Plan A model now splits the AI fleet into a general tier and a small, much faster inference-specialized tier. The dashboard's AI legend row shows the fastest speed — e.g. "28M Reliable Agents at up to ×114 speed" instead of the old single average — and hovering the AI Labor row reveals the live split in matching counts, e.g. "28M run at ×6 speed · 23K at ×114 speed".
Mobile bottom bar redesigned
The bottom strip drops its frosted-glass look for a flat paper-colored card and shrinks from 100px to 76px tall; the globe now pokes above the bar's top edge with datacenters drawn as clearly visible towers. The strip also gains hand-authored camera zooms at the plan-choice beats and fades out while you read the epilogue.
flat opaque card, 76px tall
datacenter towers on the strip globe
fades out during the epilogue
Narration player: autoplay, new placement, mobile bar
The header's headphone button now starts playback immediately when opened, instead of requiring a second click on play. On desktop the player bar moved to sit directly below the labor legend at the panel's full width, its unplayed track is a dashed black line, and chapter-title tooltips are no longer cut off at the bar's edges. Mobile gains its own narration row (play/pause, scrub, time, speed) under the bottom strip.
playback starts on open
bar sits below the labor legend
mobile strip gains a narration row
Mobile dashboard: taps, legend, and clipping fixes
Tapping a stat now opens its full-screen detail page instead of surfacing a floating hover tooltip; the labor legend stacks one entry per row instead of overflowing narrow columns; the fourth stat, "Total Slowdown", no longer clips against the power treemap on any phone width; and the detail pages' header year, previously missing entirely, now renders.
stat taps open detail pages
labor legend stacks per row
detail pages show the year
Fixes for a page crash on some iPhones
The 62MB narration audio no longer loads until you first press play — a reader returning with the player open sees "0:00 / --:--" until playing — and the globes now pause while scrolled off screen and render at lower resolution. The mobile strip's projected-future capability line is drawn solid instead of dashed. Together these stop a reliable page crash on iOS-beta iPhones.
Epilogue galaxies now drawn from real galaxy data
Policy scatter chart: labels on every point
Each dot in the policy scatter chart now carries its policy's slogan as an always-visible label, replacing the old hover tooltip (labels hide on phones, where tapping still opens the panel). Axis and tooltip text are larger, the explanation panel matches the page's prose size, and the midpoint guide lines are gone.
Power treemap: marks for unnamed labs, new OpenAI logo
Choosing a plan animates the branch content in
Graph year pill restyled smaller, glides smoothly
Fixed graph stuck looping a hovered plan's preview
Table footnotes no longer park at the page top
Fixed duplicate "Security in Plan A" card
Cmd-F no longer switches the plan branch
Takeoff explorer embed: full-screen link removed
The "Open full screen" link below the embedded takeoff explorer is gone; the embed itself is unchanged.
April 2026
April 20th
Initial migration to the new layout. Future entries will be added here as the scenarios and research evolve.